Agenda
January 7-9, 1996 Tokyo, Japan
- 1.
- Opening
- 1.1
- Convenor's Remarks ... Dr. Seiji Ohsumi, Director-General, ICR
- 1.2
- Election of Chairperson and Rapporteur
- 1.3
- Adoption of Agenda
- 1.4
- Introduction of Participants and Observers
- 1.5
- Publication of the Report
- 1.6
- Announcements from the Secretariat
- 2.
- Background of the Workshop
- 2.1
- Objectives of the Workshop
- 2.2
- Nature, Benefits, and Limits of Legal Discourse
- 3.
- Documentation
- 3.1
- Paper Presentations by Participants
- 3.2
- Review of Contents of Casebook and Other Relevant Documents
- 4.
- Discussion of Legal Issues
- 4.1
- Present Legal Status of IWC
- 4.1.1
- The Nature of International Regimes
- 4.2
- Rights and Obligations of Member States under the ICRW
- 4.2.1
- Relationship of ICRW to Obligations Under the Vienna Law of
Treaties
- 4.3
- Moratorium on Commercial Whaling
- 4.3.1
- Interpretation of Schedule
- 4.3.2
- Article V of ICRW (Objection Clause)
- 4.4
- Southern Ocean Sanctuary
- 4.4.1
- ICRW and Schedule Amendment for Southern Ocean Sanctuary
- 4.4.2
- Scientific Advice and legal requirements under the SOS
- 4.5
- Resolutions of the IWC - Are they binding upon the parties?
- 4.5.1
- Case-by-case analysis
- 4.6
- Relationship of ICRW with Other Legal Instruments
- 4.6.1
- UNCLOS III Convention
- 4.6.2
- Straddling Stocks Agreement
- 4.6.3
- Central Bering Sea Pollock Agreement
- 4.6.4
- Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living
Resources
- 4.6.5
- Biodiversity Convention
- 4.6.6
- Agenda 21
- 4.7
- Use of Boycotts, Trade Sanctions and other Measures under a
State's Domestic Jurisdiction to Enforce A Claim That Another State
Is Violating Its International Environmental Obligations
- 4.8
- Morality, Cultural Diversity, Human Rights and the Legality of
Acts Which Harm Dependent Peoples
- 4.8.1
- Sustainability as a Legal and Moral Standard
- 4.8.2
- The Lethal Utilization of Cetaceans
- 4.8.3
- Small-type Coastal Community Based Whaling
- 4.8.4
- Jus Cogens and Imposed Regimes
- 4.9
- Recourse of States Who Believe Their Rights have been Violated
under ICRW
- 4.9.1
- ICRW lack of dispute-settlement procedures
- 4.9.2
- Negotiation
- 4.9.3
- Conciliation
- 4.9.4
- Arbitration
- 4.9.5
- Judicial Settlement
- 4.9.6
- What is the most Appropriate Venue?
- 4.9.6.1
- ICJ
- 4.9.6.2
- UNCLOS III
- 4.9.6.3
- Straddling Stocks
- 4.9.6.4
- Other
- 4.10
- Science, Law and the ICRW
- 4.11
- Are There Other Better Legal Models For Resolving Disputes Over
the Management of Whales?
- 5.
- Other Matters
- 6.
- Discussion of Final Report
- 7.
- Future Tasks
_