(from "Chairman's Report of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting")
There was considerable discussion in the Technical Committee on the date and place of the meeting, which the Seychelles indicated it was prepared to host. The financial implications at a time of severe constraint within the Commission caused some countries to suggest that the meeting should be delayed until the next financial year, although there was general agreement that a venue in the Indian Ocean area would be particularly appropriate.
The Commission accepted the suggestions by the Seychelles that the meeting should be held in the early months of 1985, and the arrangements and financial aspects will be decided next year.
10.2 Protected areas for whales within national jurisdiction
At its last meeting the Commission instructed the Secretary to write to
Contracting Governments for information on their national legislation within
waters in which they exercise jurisdiction concerning areas where whale species
populations are protected from whaling.
Replies were received from Australia, Denmark, Mexico, Norway, Seychelles,
South Africa, the USSR, the UK, and the USA.
In addition, the Secretariat abstracted whaling material from a paper prepared
under direction of the FAO Legislation Branch for the FAO/UNEP Consultation
on the Global Plan of Action for the Conservation, Management and Utilisation
of Marine Mammals.
The Commission had been looking for those areas under national jurisdiction which were equivalent to sanctuaries under IWC regulations, i.e. where whales are protected from catching. In the absence of any further information the Technical Committee assumed that no other areas existed apart from those identified by the eight Governments which had responded, and the Commission took note of this.
Mexico commented on the distinction between a refuge - a place where special protection for activities such as breeding occurs - and other areas designated as sanctuaries.
_